Trading Bot
Automated execution surfaces — Telegram, Discord, web bots routing copy-trade, sniper, AFK auto-trade flows.
See all 36 Trading Bot →
The Polymarket Builder Program attributes on-chain volume to 380 third-party
products via the builderCode hash. We tracked every one of them.
70.8% of all routed volume flows through the top 6 builders;
the bottom 200 share roughly 1%. $3.17B of cumulative
attribution sits behind the leaderboard, but the shape of the ecosystem — the chains, the venues,
the categories, the tags, the founders, the funding — is impossible to read from a single
ranked list. This page is the read.
The single most important fact about the Polymarket Builders ecosystem is its extreme volume concentration. 10 builders route 80% of all-time attributed volume; the bottom 190 share 0.07% combined. The Gini coefficient is 0.958 — a level of concentration that would qualify as near-monopoly in any other market.
The bottom of the curve maps cumulative builders; the top maps cumulative volume. If every builder were equal it'd sit on the dashed diagonal. Instead it's bent almost to the ceiling — 10 builders route 80% of all volume.
Every builder gets exactly one category — the answer to "what kind of product is this?" — and zero-to-many tags — cross-cutting attributes describing surface (Telegram, mobile, desktop), function (copy-trading, sniper, whale-tracking), domain (sports, politics, crypto-markets), trust (non-custodial, open-source) and pricing (free, paid). Categories never overlap with tags. Each card below shows the category's total volume, top 5 builders by all-time routed volume, and the most common tags.
Automated execution surfaces — Telegram, Discord, web bots routing copy-trade, sniper, AFK auto-trade flows.
See all 36 Trading Bot →Professional UIs that wrap Polymarket's CLOB — fast order entry, richer portfolio views, advanced order types.
See all 25 Trading Terminal →Multi-venue terminals routing across Polymarket + Kalshi, Limitless, and other prediction-market venues.
See all 32 Aggregator →Self-custodial wallets that route Polymarket trades from inside their dApp surface.
See all 15 Wallet →Sports-first wrappers that re-skin Polymarket as a traditional sportsbook.
See all 11 Sports →Centralised exchanges and DEX integrations routing Polymarket exposure via builderCode.
See all 8 Exchange →Fully autonomous LLM-driven products that suggest, score, or execute prediction-market positions.
See all 42 AI Agent →Order-book data, smart-money scoring, alerts, dashboards, signal feeds, browser extensions.
See all 44 Analytics →Pooled or systematic capital — funds, prop firms, market-making, leverage, structured notes.
See all 12 Capital →Builders whose product surface is not publicly verifiable or doesn't fit the nine above.
See all 155 Other →The leaderboard rank tells you who routes the most volume; this scatter tells you whether that volume comes from a few whales or a real retail base. Top-left builders move millions through a handful of wallets — usually CEX routing or institutional channels. Top-right are the genuine retail breakouts. Bottom-left is the long tail of personal codes and test integrations.
Each dot is one of 380 builders, positioned by trailing-30-day monthly active users (X) and monthly routed volume (Y), both log-scaled. Dot size is all-time cumulative volume. Top-right is genuine retail traction; top-left is institutional or whale routing (high volume, single-digit users); bottom-right is mass-market low-ticket; bottom-left is the long tail of personal codes and test integrations.
Where does the volume actually come from, and where does it land? Most ecosystem analysis treats Polymarket as a single point; in practice, builders aggregate deposits from 6+ chains and route to 6 different settlement venues. Polygon → Polymarket dominates; Solana → Polymarket emerges via Jupiter; Kalshi gets its share via multi-venue aggregators.
Volume flow across the top 6 chains, top 25 builders, and top 6 venues, weighted by all-time routed volume. The thickest path is Polygon → Polymarket: nearly every builder lands there. Solana's contribution flows mostly through Jupiter's Polymarket integration. Kalshi's slice is held up by a small set of multi-venue aggregators (Stand, River Markets, Synthesis). Click a builder bar to open its profile.
Categories tell you what a builder is; tags tell you what it does (or where it lives, or what it costs). This grid crosses our 10 categories with our 19-tag taxonomy. Darker cells show the most common combinations. Click any non-empty cell to open /builders pre-filtered to that exact intersection.
| Telegram | Discord | Mobile | Desktop | Extension | Web | Copy trading | Sniper | Whale tracking | News-driven | Backtesting | Arbitrage | Sports | Politics | Crypto markets | Non-custodial | Open source | Free | Paid | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trading Bot | 12 | 3 | · | · | · | 20 | 26 | · | 11 | · | 3 | · | · | · | 6 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Trading Terminal | · | · | 4 | · | · | 21 | · | · | · | 3 | · | · | · | · | · | 7 | · | 8 | · |
| Aggregator | 6 | · | · | · | · | 27 | 9 | · | 8 | 4 | · | · | 4 | · | 10 | 5 | · | 5 | · |
| Wallet | · | · | 13 | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | 5 | 13 | · | 10 | · |
| Sports | · | · | · | · | · | 8 | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | 3 | · |
| Exchange | · | · | 3 | · | · | 6 | 3 | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | 4 | · | · | · | · |
| AI Agent | · | · | · | · | · | 34 | 3 | · | · | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | · | 12 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 |
| Analytics | 6 | · | 3 | · | 3 | 30 | 5 | · | 21 | 5 | 3 | · | · | · | 8 | · | 3 | 13 | 10 |
| Capital | · | · | · | · | · | 11 | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | 4 | · | · | · |
| Other | · | · | · | · | · | 5 | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · | · |
Cells show the number of builders that combine a category (row) with a tag (column). Click any non-empty cell to open /builders filtered by both. The darkest cells indicate the most common combinations — Telegram surfaces dominate the Trading Bot row, copy-trading appears across both Bot and Aggregator categories, non-custodial defines the Wallet column, and sports + politics split the domain lanes.
69 builders disclose funding; 35 additional builders ship with named founders but no disclosed round. Multi-builder investors below; the rest follow in a flat list.
All 380 Polymarket Builder Program profiles, ranked by all-time routed volume. Search, filter by category, click a row to open the profile.
Want sortable columns and live period switching? Open the full power-user table →
The Polymarket Builder Program lets third-party developers attribute on-chain trade volume to a unique builderCode (a 32-byte hash) and earn a share of fees. As of 2026-05-26, 380 builders participate, routing $3.17B of cumulative volume. The ecosystem includes Telegram bots, Discord bots, browser extensions, mobile apps, desktop terminals, AI agents, market makers, copy-trading platforms, prediction-tool aggregators, sports-focused frontends, and wallet integrations — all spanning the same underlying CLOB on Polygon.
Extremely. The Gini coefficient is 0.958 — a value of 1.0 would mean a single builder routes all volume; a value of 0 would mean every builder routes the same. The top 10 builders route 80% of all-time attributed volume; the top 36 route 95%. The bottom 190 builders share just 0.07% combined. Betmoar alone accounts for $1.34B (42.3% of cumulative volume). This is a classic power-law distribution.
Polygon dominates (Polymarket's settlement chain — 266+ builders). Solana is the fastest-growing rail via Jupiter's Polymarket integration. Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, and BNB Chain all appear in deposit-source flows. Builders typically claim Polymarket attribution by funding from multiple chains, but the actual order settles on Polygon.
Polymarket-verified is the official ✓ flag from the Polymarket Data API — the platform's own internal review. Editorial-verified is our flag — we manually researched the builder's product website, confirmed it loads and matches the builder identity, and wrote/audited a description. The two are independent; a builder can be Polymarket-verified but Editorial-unverified (we haven't researched yet), or vice versa.
47 builders have disclosed funding. Notable backers include a16z CSX (PIN AI), ParaFi Capital (Jupiter, $35M), Y Combinator (EthosX, Rainbow, Stand), 776 / Seven Seven Six (Rainbow $18M Series A), Pantera + Ethena + Coinbase Ventures (Based), New Form Capital (Tread.fi $3.5M pre-seed), AllianceDAO (Polycule $560K), Frachtis (Fireplace $1.5M pre-seed), Ethereal Ventures (FereAI $1.3M), and many more. The Funding section above breaks out every named investor.
28 builders are tagged tg-bot (a Telegram-native interface), including PolyCop, Polygun, Kreo (KreoPoly), Polybot, Polycule, Onsight, Sides.trade, Bankr, Insiders.bot, Dextrabot, Polychads, Polysignals, PolyTap, and others. Of these, ~15 ship explicit copy-trading; the rest are direct execution bots or signal/alert services.
42 builders are tagged "aggregator" — they route across two or more prediction-market venues. Polymarket × Kalshi is the most common combination (Stand, Cobot, Synthesis, Bravado, Predex, Polymatics). Polymarket × Hyperliquid appears in Bullpen, Based, Glint, Vatic, Arcex, Flipx, Wick. Solana DEX × Polymarket appears via Jupiter and Lute. Tovest and Berry route Polymarket alongside tokenised US equities.
Daily. A GitHub Action runs at 06:00 UTC: it pulls the Polymarket Data API for fresh leaderboard stats, runs the enrichment pipeline for any new builders, then rebuilds the ecosystem-data.json bundle this page consumes. The page is statically generated, so what you see is yesterday's snapshot — current to within 24 hours.